|
CASE STUDY
 Background
In 1991 I wrote a political satire entitled "In the Year 2252"
(P. Barber, pseudonym). Copies were circulated prematurely by a Chicago
literary agent. As a result, many publishers, editors and writers accessed
copies.
Before a second draft was prepared it was clear covert censorship would
prevent any possibility of publication... I was already under 24 hour
a day surveillance and was fielding feedback from corrupt sections of
the entertainment industry; especially the media.
The reasons for their objections are many. The book was critical of many
things which criminals in high places use to get what they want (and control
others). Corruption, drugs, war, media deception, and all manner of immorality
were openly attacked in the novel. I also lobbied on privacy laws. The
personal repercussions are outlined below. (What the media did is highlighted
under "Feedback")
`
While reading this account please keep in mind the wide reaching influence
of covert agencies and organised crime throughout our community. A few
"well placed" people in each area can create havoc for those being silenced.
Others working with these criminals are too selfish, scared or apathetic
to intervene.
Also, because wealthy criminals may make false accusations I state, as
fact, that not only have I never committed any wrongdoing whatsoever but
I have never even contemplated any wrongdoing. I've responded to the harassment
defensively but verbally, with indignation, anger and even humour but
that's all. Accordingly, any misinterpreted or "altered" writings etc
should be ignored.
NOTE: Examples of feedback that made me aware of the "set up" possibilities
included:-
(a) Learning (from the security/P.I industries) that the word was out
to "wash your hands of it" meaning not to talk to me and (b) being referred
to media identities (esp. T.V presenter M.Willesee) by one P.I who did
investigate. Apparently, having sold his horse racing interests, he was
to be trusted.? Having little knowledge of corruption in that industry
or any other (including the drug trade/media/agency connection) I was
puzzled by this. In any event, being unable to see M.Willesee I tried
meeting some of his colleagues (see "Meetings" Jan 97).
Who
Knows?
The following people know who is involved:
Note: Channel 9 owner,
Kerry Packer is not the only media magnate who wants me silenced. No media
player would want the general public becoming fully aware of the invasions
of privacy and crimes which journalists and agency officials commit. Remember,
I lobbied heavily on privacy laws for years with John Howard himself supporting
my views, in writing.
Those
harassed for helping me
  |
ROSS SAUNDERS,
ex head of religious programming at Ch 2. He confirmed all my suspicions
about the media's involvement and advised me. He was forced to move
because of the covert harassment he endured.
|
| |
DAVID SANDERSON,
B-Grade moviemaker. He called and volunteered to make a documentary
on the covert, technological attacks on decent people who spoke/wrote
about evil in high places. He said it sickened him…however, he and
those he approached to help were frightened/blackmailed into dropping
the plan completely.
|
| |
HOMI BAHRAMALI
- Neuroscience/psychiatry - Westmead Hospital. He was working on his
own neurophone so his harassment was largely due to his own work.
He now works at The Centre For The Mind (Sydney Uni) but is cautious
about offering real help to victims, for obvious reasons.
|
| |
SEAN EDWARDS,
ex Special Branch (NSW Police) and AFP officers, Graham Cane, Mick
Roberts, Jeff Sundin, Chris Woods and Mark Andrews also helped but
weren't harassed. |
Various
means of harassment & persecution
Blacklisting
Since
mid 1991 I have been kept from full-time gainful employment. This is
despite the fact I have degrees in Law and Economics and a solid working
background that includes time with The Chamber of Commerce, a major
bank and the Australian taxation office. "Instructions" were probably
circulated by those involved in criminal activities. (One private investigator
told me the word was out that everyone was to "wash their
hands" of the matter. No-one would dare help.)
Many obstacles stand between me and real work although I have been "allowed"
simple work: telemarketing.
Overt
Intimidation
| |
I've
been followed and harassed by corrupt P.I.'s and police, however they
have not accosted me at any stage.
|
| |
At
crucial moments, crank phone calls come through to my home. Nothing
is ever said. Silence... then they hang up.
|
| |
My
mail (esp. from the USA) is often intercepted. IF I get it then it's
either opened/annotated or a reply of little consequence. eg: one
letter had a drawing of a surveillance satellite monitoring me and
the words "Have a nice day".
|
| |
Helicopters
and small planes deliberately "buzz" my home and follow (or even hover
overhead) as I walk/drive. This can happen countless times on any
given day or night in clear view of friends/relatives. This can be
triggered by an event (eg. Going to the mailbox), a political statement
I make in private (sometimes bringing in up to three "choppers" immediately)
or a time of day (e.g. when a particular Channel 9 or Channel 7 current
affairs program is running).
|
| |
Siren
"wailing" can also be triggered in a similar manner to the aircraft
harassment. Embarrassingly, these often coincide with trips to the
bathroom etc. If I'm on the street, ambulances will wait on corners
or stop their sirens as they approach me; often turning around (clearly
going nowhere in particular). |
NB: False
alarms, corrupt dispatchers and bribes to pilots (for flight deviations)
all help effect these forms of harassment. My enquiries revealed all
of these are common practices.
Surveillance
From 1991
until this day I have been under 24 hour a day satellite audio/visual
surveillance. The results have been made available to politicians and
journalists. Private investigators confirmed that ex PM, P. Keating
and Channel 9 "A Current Affair" personnel were actively involved, but
there were many others. (Notably some Labor politicians worked for Kerry
Packer's Channel 9 after retiring eg: Richardson, Hawke).
Without
their knowledge, my relatives were also frequently monitored in the
early '90's. Notably by late 1996 the direct media monitoring
of the (agency) signals stopped as more advanced satellite systems were
employed. It is suspected this may be due to the fact that the Liberal
government (elected March '96) were not actively involved in the harassment
so other means of attacking me were found. However I am uncertain of
the precise reason.
Feedback
| |
Countless
speeches, news items, advertisements, scripts and "writings" have
been peppered with my ideas/words/phrases. These came not only from
the surveillance results but also the book which, though covertly
"banned" by the criminals concerned, was also extensively "used"
by many writers / editors; especially those working for Rupert Murdoch
(eg: Harper Collins, the Telegraph etc).
Not only did I find some TV executives that admitted such thefts
and harassment techniques are used, but one even openly admitted
his own people were partially to blame.
|
| |
Much
of the feedback involves subtle but constant death threats.
|
| |
Many
media personnel in Sydney were clearly informed of the relevant
audio surveillance frequencies and were monitoring directly until
late 1996. This was made most obvious by comments made by "live
to air" broadcasters (TV / radio). Clearly the presenters were
signalled and "fed". With the advent of neurophone harassment
and brain scanning (in my case) there was a less direct (delayed
or relayed) feedback…as if the media could no longer directly monitor
the signals. However, the speed of feedback picked up again in later
years. In any event, the feedback of thoughts can be even more oppressive
than the feedback of words…Both continue to this day.
In my case, the switch (to more advanced monitoring systems) also
coincided with the PM's office instructing that I would no longer
receive replies to my correspondence; though the significance may
be minor. For all I know I may merely have been taking the place
of another politically selected experimental target; for an illegal
human research programme.
|
Examples
of feedback (by Channel 9)
| 1. |
PROMOS
- eg: Kerry Packer's ACP Director, Mr Graeme Cubbin, admitted that
the "I AM CHANNEL 9" promo was in fact aimed AT me. Many of the on
air presenters working at 9 featured in that ad; I believe most knew
what they were doing.
|
| 2. |
PHRASES
- eg: Just before "A Current Affair" ended on
Channel 9 for 1992, then presenter Jana Wendt was quoted in a magazine
as saying: "I guess I'll go to my grave not being able to think past
the end of my nose", a comment I made (knowing it would be overheard)
just prior to that interview (not exactly a common saying). And it
was not the only reference in the article. Coincidences? Imagine such
coincidences happening a dozen times a day - for years - and you'll
appreciate why this "parroting" is so useful to them. It's extremely
oppressive.
|
| 3. |
DIRECT
FEEDBACK - eg: On at least two memorable occasions I responded
to "live" taunts by Channel 9 employees only to have the entire transmission
cut completely and immediately.
|
| 4. |
OTHER
"COINCIDENCES" - eg: ACA, Ch.9 presenter, Ray Martin, ran an item
on politicians who don't answer correspondence. They suggested viewers
use a company called Voterlobby.
The link is that I'd just contacted the Prime Minister's chief
of staff about my many (and various) unanswered letters to Mr Howard
and his Cabinet AND had used Voterlobby to question MPs on the need
for enforceable privacy laws. (Prior to being elected in March 1996
Mr Howard had been supportive of my views)
Also, on the day my mum received her cancer test results (Aug 04)
Dr John Holts "cancer" treatments featured on Ch9's A.C.A. Subsequent
items on Dr Holt coincided with treatment milestones for my mum.
Cynical attacks like this test your patience and prove that those
behind the harassment will stop at nothing.
|
 Meetings
(Jan 97)
Eg. 1 Mike Minehan (Ex Ch.9, ACA, UTS)
A security guard tried to prevent our appointment taking place; under
instructions from an "unknown" outside caller. Similarly, Minehan was
interrupted constantly by phone calls. On the last call he slammed the
phone down exclaiming: "They're telling me to get out. Now!" However
he had already told me that my situation was "not uncommon". He suggested
I see Jana Wendt. He seemed genuinely worried.
Although it seems naïve now, at the time I thought journalists (et
al) may help re the brainwave/neurophone torture. I even contacted one
or two who had personally harassed me with surveillance feedback.
Eg. 2 Jana Wendt (Ex Ch.9, ACA, Ch.7 etc)
She was dismissed from Ch.7 just before our appointment so I visited
her family home instead. She said her secretary would make another appointment
but warned me that TV execs control things. (Messrs D. Leckie, Rice
and others who moved from Ch.9 to Ch.7 were undoubtedly involved).
Eastwood police later harrassed me, at the request of their "friends"
at Ch.7. They refused to speak to Wendt personally. I was told not to
make any appointment and was taken to a psychiatric hospital as a "warning".
Before I was assessed and released (by a bemused psychiatrist who saw
no reason for my being there at all) "knowledgeable" staff told me that
at least six others who sought assistance from Wendt had also been sent
there. "This is what you get for crossing them "said one senior nurse.
(They knew yet co-operated). An FOI request indicated that Detectives
Pollock and Spurr were warning me on behalf of Ch7 execs but Police
Internal Affairs did nothing (esp. as TV identities were involved).
I also discovered that the Police "psych" (a Dr. R. Burek) had claimed
that our 3 minute discussion took 45 mins and had later tried to erase
his annotation claiming I suffered from "auditory hallucinations". He
had to try to remove it before I got it because I hadn't mentioned that
to anyone during the incident, including him. The honest psychiatrist
at the hospital who had let me go also observed this but left it to
me to pursue the corrupt parties.
Since this worrying episode I have learnt much about the role of mainstream
media identities from agency officials, on-air targets etc. Little wonder
suppression and oppression are rife in this country (and many other
western "democracies"). The media mafia has far too much power.
Eg. 3 Kerry Packer (media magnate, ACP etc)
While I waited at reception Mr Packer and his son exited the car park
and took the lift; James Packer looking back at me before disappearing
into the elevator. Six goons then surrounded me, the leader claiming
I'd been up to Packer's 3rd floor office six times. (I wasn't even sure
Packer would be there. Also, this was my only visit and I was on the
ground floor). When I scoffed, asking for proof of this lie, he said
"Oh just get out anyway". I did. I wasn't going to give them an excuse
to set something up.
N.B. Because of these experiences no further attempts have been made
to resolve this situation face to face. Employees of media magnates,
Singleton, Packer and Murdoch are all involved in my situation. Some,
I'm told, are also involved heavily in the drug trade (hence the mafia
/ C.I.A links, and the technology access). It's also worth noting that
in 1990-91, when this all started, all three media bosses were staunchly
behind the Australian Labor Party; the central source of the problem.
However, employees of others, like Ch 7 owner Kerry Stokes, were also
clearly involved.
Comment
My own situation
is known to many and some of the more bizarre/significant "coincidences"
have been deliberately omitted. However, the brief illustration has hopefully
served its purpose.
Like the covert agencies themselves (especially the CIA), those using
surveillance results to torment innocent people are little more than
modern day (electronic) Nazis. Many are prominent public figures with
no fear of the law and little or no respect for others. Controlling
public perception / opinion through such people is a priority for both
the agencies and those whose interests they protect. Obviously only
those who are "co-operative" gain prominent positions within the relevant
media circles. In fact some sections of the media are responsible for
gross human rights abuses including (ironically) the suppression of
free speech.
Once again, freedom of the press should not grant a freedom to oppress.
NB: If a target is relatively unaffected by the media feedback
or "tunes out" to all media / entertainment output (to avoid the feedback
/ harassment) then other, more advanced forms of harassment (like the
neurophone and brain wave analysers) can take their place. This switch
may also occur if the agency / criminals responsible wish to prevent
direct monitoring of their frequencies by the media, Federal Police
etc (for whatever reason).
Religious
Persecution
Although
I am of the Catholic faith, and was subtly ridiculed for that, the Catholic
Church (which is closely aligned with the Australian Labor Party, which
fostered the situation) has also harassed me using the results of the
surveillance.
While
some priests were sympathetic (one even admitting he'd heard about the
"banned" book), others did as the church hierarchy instructed. The links
between the church, the Labor party and overseas crime figures are well
known. There may have been some "pressure" applied.
Note:
It is interesting that one of the guilty priests, an ex bikie named
Kevin Lee, was chosen as a contestant on the Pentridge Jail Challenge
run by A. Denton, Radio 2mmm, Nov 2001. Apparently he won. Odd coincidences
like this were common in the early 90s. (I wonder who else he harrassed).
Neurophone/Aural
Harassment
Since
September 1996, I've been receiving constant/clear threats and propaganda
from an unknown agency/criminal source; probably the CIA.
This method
of "torture" (which seems to be known to many political/media entities)
is usually delivered courtesy of a satellite which tracks you, personally.
A laser directs live talk, noise and computer-generated music at the
body. It travels the nervous system as electrical impulses and registers
in the brain; bypassing normal hearing mechanisms. Only the target hears
it.
Prominent
journalists and senior federal police say it's "not uncommon" and I
know there are thousands of political victims in the USA and hundreds
here.
The motives
for this form of oppression seem to go beyond providing an "annoyance".
The hope "seems" to be that the victim will be discredited if they react
badly to the verbal taunts OR approach the wrong people for assistance.
For example, media "mafia" personnel, politically naïve medicos or ignorant
police could make matters worse. In the US, where the authorities refuse
to concede their own government encourages such activities, the complainants
are often committed.
Meanwhile,
senior federal police, some political aides and human rights activists
are the most supportive here. Many are honest enough to admit they know
which technologies big brother agencies and criminals can access. However
practical help cannot be offered.
Experimentation
- Brain wave Monitoring
Also since
September 1996, I've been humiliated as a target of an experimental
technology (again, satellite based) which allows the magnetic field
around your head to be monitored. This powerful scanning and tracking
system delivers the results to an unknown (probably US) facility with
an advanced computer system capable of interpreting the brain wave patterns
it receives; instantaneously.
The aural
feedback then makes for a means of remote interrogation and/or psychological
torture. Combined with audio/visual surveillance the overall situation
is like being in an electronic POW camp. One senior AFP executive said
this may continue for many years and they are powerless to stop it.
The human rights abuses I'm experiencing are considerable. However,
what concerns me most is that ostensibly democratic governments can
allow the development and "use" of such evil technologies to stifle
free speech.
Murdered Whistleblowers
Although I never met either man Neurosurgeon/psychiatrist, Alistair
Stuart and Black Mountain Tower (Canberra) chief technician, Bill Roy
were both threatened, harassed then killed for trying to disclose information
on high tech surveillance/harassment (Bill's area) and political psychiatry
(Alistair's concern).
The extreme measures taken to stop good men who would have spoken
with knowledge AND authority serves as a warning to others. It, of course,
doesn't excuse the active participation of so many criminals in public
life who help repress and destroy decent people merely for speaking
the truth…Instead of helping, the media are the worst protagonists.
They're antagonists, not allies, of the truth and those that seek it.
Conclusion
Many
public figures betray us by their silence on these matters. Many politicians/journalists
are actively oppressing others themselves; by stealth. And you won't
read about it because the media are themselves part of the problem.
Finally,
it may be worth noting the comments of a senior investigator from NASA's
Inspector General's office. Having conceded the existence of the technologies
mentioned in these pages AND commenting on the evil uses made of such
anti-personnel weaponry he advised: "I suggest you pray".
Please
contact the UN, the International Red Cross or Amnesty International
to express your concerns.
|
|
